Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix Javadoc of TimetableSnapshotManager.snapshot #5930

Merged

Conversation

leonardehrenfried
Copy link
Member

Summary

@vpaturet has reported that in one the previous realtime-related PRs, I didn't correctly move the Javadoc for the snapshot field in TimetableSnapshotManager.

@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2024 11:39
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 69.45%. Comparing base (ce93c85) to head (fd222ec).
Report is 1 commits behind head on dev-2.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             dev-2.x    #5930   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      69.45%   69.45%           
- Complexity     17065    17066    +1     
==========================================
  Files           1934     1934           
  Lines          73624    73624           
  Branches        7539     7539           
==========================================
  Hits           51134    51134           
+ Misses         19866    19865    -1     
- Partials        2624     2625    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried merged commit a171460 into opentripplanner:dev-2.x Jun 27, 2024
5 checks passed
@leonardehrenfried leonardehrenfried deleted the timetable-javadoc branch June 27, 2024 14:34
@t2gran t2gran added this to the 2.6 (next release) milestone Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants